AS 178HS Modern
Where a specific Aluron geometry, slim interlock or an established AS 178HS production route is required.
SYSTEM / COMPARE
AS 178HS MODERN VS MASTERPATIO HI
These are two different ecosystems for large sliding elements. Comparison starts with the architectural line, grid, threshold and glazing, and ends with the actual fabricator and junction design.
TECHNICAL FRAME
Compare equivalent parameters.
Values are configuration references. Final limits and performance must be confirmed by the fabricator for the actual scheme, dimensions, glass and hardware.
| Parameter | Aluron AS 178HS Modern | Reynaers MasterPatio HI |
|---|---|---|
| Indicative maximum sash | up to 3300 × 3300 mm | up to 3600 × 3600 mm |
| Sash mass | up to 600 kg | up to 600 kg |
| Glazing range | up to 59 mm | 16–62 mm |
| Interlock | options around 25 / 50 mm depending on solution | minimal configurations depend on the chosen variant |
| Thermal reference | Uw from 0.7 W/m²K in a relevant configuration | Uw down to 0.8 W/m²K in a relevant configuration |
DECISION
When each direction makes sense.
MasterPatio HI
Where Reynaers integration, large formats and consistency with other brand systems matter.
Check before price
Actual interlock section, reinforcements, hardware, glass build-up, finished threshold, drainage and service.
FAQ
Short answers before selection.
Is comparing catalogue Uw enough?
No. Uw follows dimensions, frame fraction, glass, spacer and opening scheme.
Which system has the slimmer interlock?
It depends on configuration, reinforcement and meeting-stile type. Compare working sections.
What determines heavy-sash service life?
Hardware, base accuracy, frame geometry, track cleanliness, correct glazing and maintenance.
COMPARE / PROJECT
Align Aluron and Reynaers in one specification.
We compare equivalent grid, glass, threshold, hardware and installation rather than marketing tables.
Compare for my project ↗